While exploring identity and access management (IAM) solutions, Okta & Azure AD are two common options for IT decision-makers. In the ongoing Okta vs Azure AD comparison, both offer strong security features, including multifactor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO), and user lifecycle management.But selecting the best fit for your business can feel overwhelming.
In this blog, we’ll help you navigate the key differences and similarities between these two powerful platforms, providing you with the insights you need to make an informed decision and choose the right solution for your organization.
What is Okta?
Okta is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) platform that helps businesses secure user authentication.
It provides single sign-on (SSO), multifactor authentication (MFA), and lifecycle management for employees, partners, and customers. Okta integrates with thousands of applications to streamline access control and security.
Pros and Cons of Okta
Let’s take a closer look at what makes Okta stand out — along with some things you might want to consider before making your choice.
Pros or Advantages of Using Okta
- Simplified Access: Okta improves application access by using a single set of login credentials, eliminating the need for users to remember multiple passwords. This Single Sign-On (SSO) feature simplifies the user experience considerably.
- Enhanced Security: Okta strengthens security through methods like Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) and Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). These techniques add extra layers of verification, such as codes sent to a mobile device or fingerprint scans, in addition to a password.
- Improved Access Control: For businesses, Okta offers better control over data access. It allows companies to monitor and manage which individuals can access specific applications and data, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive information. This ensures employees only have access to the resources they need for their jobs.
Cons and Challenges of Using Okta
- Complexity: Setting up and administering Okta, with its diverse features, can be challenging, particularly for companies lacking dedicated IT staff.
- Compatibility Issues: While Okta excels with applications supporting SSO, older or custom-designed apps might not be fully compatible, limiting its effectiveness in those scenarios.
- Additional Costs: Some of Okta's more sophisticated security features, such as biometric logins and device passkeys, come with added costs. Companies must weigh the value of these advanced features against the extra expenditure.
- Cost can be Expensive: Okta's pricing can be a significant factor, potentially posing a financial burden, especially for smaller businesses or startups. The pricing structure might require paying for more capacity than is actually needed.
What is Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID)?
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), now part of Microsoft Entra ID, is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) service.
This IAM software controls who has access to your organization's resources, both within Microsoft Azure and other cloud or on-premises environments. Think of it as a central directory that stores user identities and their permissions, allowing secure access to applications and data.
Pros and Cons of Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID)
Now, let’s explore the pros and cons of Azure AD, so you can see what it does well and where it might not be the perfect fit for your needs.
Pros or Advantages of Using Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID)
- A Good Option for Hybrid Infrastructure: Azure AD excels in hybrid environments, seamlessly connecting your on-premises Active Directory with the cloud. This allows for unified identity management across both your existing infrastructure and cloud resources, simplifying administration and user experience.
- Has Conditional Access: Conditional Access is a powerful security feature that lets you enforce granular access controls based on various factors like user location, device, and application.
- Allows You to Use SSO: Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by allowing them to log in once and gain access to multiple applications without re-entering their credentials. This improves user productivity and reduces the risk of password fatigue.
- Self-Service and Easy Process to Update Credentials: Azure AD provides self-service capabilities for users to manage their own passwords and profiles. This reduces the burden on IT support and empowers users to maintain their account information.
- Good Framework for Managing Access Across Microsoft Tools: Azure AD is tightly integrated with other Microsoft cloud services like Microsoft 365 and Azure. This makes it the ideal solution for organizations heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Cons and Challenges of Using Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID)
- Challenging for Companies Without a Dedicated IT Team to Set Up: Setting up and configuring Azure AD can be complex, especially for organizations without dedicated IT expertise. Proper planning and understanding of the various features are essential for a successful implementation.
- Some Users Reported Issues With Tenant Sync: Synchronizing users and groups between on-premises Active Directory and Azure AD (tenant sync) can sometimes present challenges. Troubleshooting these issues may require technical expertise and careful configuration.
- Not as Flexible or Customizable as Some IAM Software: While Azure AD offers robust features, some highly specialized IAM solutions might provide greater flexibility and customization options. Organizations with unique or complex identity management needs might need to evaluate alternative solutions.
- Not All Features Come With the Same License: Azure AD offers different tiers of licensing, with some advanced features requiring higher-level subscriptions. Organizations need to carefully evaluate their requirements and choose the appropriate license to access the necessary functionalities.
- Some Users Reported Issues With the Layout: The user interface layout of Azure AD, for some is less intuitive than other alternatives. Microsoft periodically updates the interface, so user experience may vary. User feedback plays a role in interface improvements.
Okta vs Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID) Features: Which is Better?
1. Multifactor Authentication (MFA)
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a key security measure that adds an extra layer of protection for your organization. Both Okta and Azure AD offer powerful MFA features designed to enhance security, but each platform approaches it differently.
Okta provides a broad range of MFA options, including push notifications, SMS, voice calls, and security keys, known for its flexible and user-friendly experience.
Azure AD offers robust MFA capabilities, and supporting methods like authenticator apps, SMS, and phone calls. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft services, providing a unified security experience. Azure AD's MFA is a key part of its comprehensive security platform.
2. Passwordless Authentication
Passwordless authentication is becoming a popular and secure way to sign in without using traditional passwords. Okta supports passwordless login through methods like Okta Verify and WebAuthn, allowing users to sign in securely without needing to remember passwords. Okta emphasizes modern, passwordless authentication.
Azure AD also supports passwordless login using methods like the Microsoft Authenticator app and Windows Hello for Business, enabling users to sign in securely without remembering complex passwords. Azure AD is continuously expanding its passwordless features.
3. User Lifecycle Management
Effective user lifecycle management is crucial for maintaining security and efficiency across an organization. Okta simplifies user management with features like self-service registration, password resets, and automated provisioning, offering a centralized platform for managing user identities and access. Okta streamlines the entire user lifecycle process.
Azure AD provides comprehensive user lifecycle management, including automated provisioning and deprovisioning. This IAM software works with on-premises Active Directory for smooth identity management. Azure AD is designed for managing users across an organization.
4. Integration Options
Seamless integration is key to ensuring systems work together efficiently. Okta integrates with a wide variety of applications and services, including cloud apps, on-premises systems, and mobile apps. It offers flexible integration options through APIs and pre-built connectors. Okta focuses on connecting diverse systems.
Azure AD integrates deeply with the Microsoft ecosystem, including Microsoft 365 and Azure services, while also offering integration capabilities with other cloud and on-premises applications. It serves as a central hub for Microsoft-centric environments.
5. Pricing
When selecting an IAM solution, cost plays a crucial role. Okta and Azure AD offer different pricing models, each with its own set of features and flexibility. Okta offers tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and features, providing flexible options for businesses of all sizes. Okta's pricing is designed to be adaptable.
Azure AD's pricing is often bundled with Microsoft 365 and Azure subscriptions. Different features are available with various licensing tiers. Azure AD's pricing is often included with other Microsoft services.
6. Customer Support
Okta is known for its responsive customer support, offering various channels like phone, email, and online resources. They provide dedicated support for different customer segments and prioritizes customer success.
Azure AD provides customer support through Microsoft's various channels, including online resources, phone support, and enterprise support agreements. Support availability may depend on your subscription level. Azure AD's support is part of the broader Microsoft support ecosystem.
Infisign: An Auth0 and Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID) Alternative
Infisign presents a contemporary IAM solution, challenging established players like Okta and Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID), especially for companies looking for simplicity, quick setup, and a developer-centric approach.
Unlike Okta's potentially complex configuration or Azure AD's sometimes intricate management, Infisign emphasizes ease of use and streamlined deployment. Here are the key features of Infisign:
- Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhance security with MFA methods like SMS, email, and app-based tokens, providing multiple layers of protection.
- User Federation with SSO: Manage user identities across multiple platforms, while SSO lets users sign in once to access all apps seamlessly.
- ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control): Grant access based on user attributes like department or email, simplifying access control for your team.
- Zero Trust Security: Continuously verify users with real-time monitoring, ensuring security based on device health, IP address, or app type.
- Network Access Gateway (NAG): Easily integrate on-premises apps into your IAM system with a gateway, overcoming traditional integration challenges.
- Conditional Access: Set access conditions based on factors like device type, location, or IP address, allowing you to control access more precisely.
- IT Access Review: Empower IT teams to instantly grant or revoke access via Slack or Teams, or automate the process with set policies.
- Passwordless Authentication with Zero Knowledge Proof: Securely authenticate users without exposing personal information, protecting accounts from hackers.
- 6000+ App Integrations: With over 6000 integrations, you can seamlessly connect your existing tools — from CRM to sales and development platforms.
Want to learn more? Book a free demo for more information!
